Community in Photography. Why it’s Important and Why It Matters.

If you’ve been here before, you will know that I used to live in London. It was whilst living here that I found my love of photography, but after several, very busy years, I needed a change of scenery and a change of pace so I decided to pack up my things and my move my entire life 260 miles north, to the North West England and set up as a landscape photographer in The Lake District.

Now there isn’t much that I miss about London. I have made the right choice for me, but one of the things that I do miss very dearly is the community of photographers that I was a part of when I lived in the Capital. Not just the people in the communities, many of whom are incredibly talented photographers and videographers, but the sense of community and the sense of belonging to something which is much bigger.

I would regularly attend large group meet ups hosted by bigger organisations and this was a good way for me to do things which were outside of my norm, things such as shooting models or exploring new parts of the country with a bunch of new people. They were also great for networking, something which is missing (in my experience) in landscape photography and is something that I am seeking to address in the future.

These large organised meet-ups were great and were where I met some people who will be lifelong friends of mine. The only downside is that you would have anything up to 200-300 photographers, all shooting the same models/scenes at the same time and this made getting something which was truly original very difficult.

These meet ups and the networking they provided also led to me joining something called “Photobattle London” - a group of photographers who would meet once a month, have two hours to photograph a theme, about 72 hours to edit your best image, submit it for public vote and potentially win a print of it (I won this twice!). This lead to the creation of a WhatsApp group which is one of the most supportive places I have experienced in photography; they really are a great bunch of people, who I have seen properly in way too long!

TL;DR

I miss the sense of community I had as a photographer in London. Landscape photography can be very solitary, especially in places like the Lake District, and I’d like to explore creating a friendly, supportive community where photographers can meet, shoot together, and share the experience. This post is about seeing whether there’s interest in making that happen.

So what is missing?

Landscape photography is so very often a solitary pursuit, and there is a lot to be said for that. It is a great way to get out into nature, to explore and to see what you can create from the incredible places that you find yourself.

I think that added on to the solitary nature of what we do, there is the fact that people don’t want to divulge their best locations (and why should they, they worked hard to find them!), going out as a group and sharing these means that everyone knows where they are and can end up creating ‘honeypots’ of photographers. This isn’t a complaint or a whinge, social media has created a monster in terms of giving people an easy way to get to some of the best spots (not just for photography) and it can mean that if you wanted to get away from some of the crowds, you can inadvertently end up walking towards one!

I think one of the other things that causes the lack of community in landscape photography is the transient nature of the population in Cumbria, which is where you will find the Lake District. There a LOT of holidaymakers who may be here for a week or two, or a day or two and then they might not visit again. This is another barrier which is raised to building a lasting community of photographers.

Follow Me On Instagram

Online Communities

Online spaces play a huge role in modern photography, but they don’t always replace the value of meeting and shooting together in person.

I can almost hear people saying “but what about the online landscape photography community?” and they would be right to ask that question. There is HUGE online landscape photography community which spreads across YouTube, Instagram, Facebook… all of the socials. It’s an active community and one that is very knowledgeable

Some of the photographer with much larger reach than I can muster have their own online communities, which bring people together from all over the world. These are great places where people can ‘meet’ to discuss photography, do some online networking and share and critique each other’s work.

I do however, think that what these communities lack is the ability to pull people together, in real life and get out there to take part in some photographer.

So What Is Missing?

Despite the size of the landscape photography world, there’s often a lack of regular, in-person connection between photographers.

Exactly what I’ve been describing: a strong, supportive, and friendly community of photographers who meet regularly to get out into the landscape, take photos, talk, learn, and enjoy doing it together.

Landscape photography doesn’t need to lose its solitary nature — that’s part of its appeal — but it also doesn’t have to be lonely. There’s space for both quiet, individual practice and shared experiences with people who understand why standing in the rain at sunrise feels like a good idea.

Why Does It Matter?

For many photographers, community isn’t about validation — it’s about shared experience, learning, and enjoying photography together.

For some people, it won’t matter and you’ll be sat there thinking “what is this bloke on about”? Some of you will be completely apathetic, and some of you will be interested to find out some more. I am not ruling anyone out of this, I am talking all of you, even the sceptics.

Community matter because of everything I spoke about in the opening to this blog - it’s a great way to meet people who like what you like, who enjoy doing what you do and have fund doing it.

It’s not about thousands of people roaming about with cameras, it’s about being out in the landscape with the people, enjoying doing what you love, sharing tips talking about the nerdy stuff and learning.

What I Want To Do About It

Get Involved

I’d like to explore building a friendly, supportive photography community centred around the Lake District — a space where photographers can meet, get out into the landscape, share ideas, and enjoy shooting together. This isn’t about money, selling anything, or large organised events. It’s about people who enjoy being here and taking photographs.

You don’t need to live in the Lake District to be involved — you just need to enjoy spending time here with a camera. If this sounds like something you’d be interested in, please fill in the form below. That’s all you need to do.

Registering your interest doesn’t sign you up to marketing emails (unless you choose to), and there’s no obligation attached. It simply allows me to gauge interest and get in touch with updates as things develop. I’ll also share updates via Facebook and Instagram for those who prefer to follow along there, feel free too drop me a DM there if that’s more you thing.

Lake District Landscape Photography Community Interest - complete the form below!

You Won’t Take Any Good Photos Today: Shifting Your Mindset in Landscape Photography.

You won’t take any good photos today. Got it?

I normally try and take a positive tone in this blog, so this feels like a bit of a harsh way to start something off, but I promise I am going somewhere with this… bear with me.

If you know me, or you have been here before, you will know that my “real” job is working in a school, as Music teacher, who just happens to teach photography as well - the latter is definitely my favourite part of my role! One thing I am always talking to students about is adopting a “growth mindset”. This is about switching the way that we think, so instead of thinking “I’m not good at this”, we say “I can get better at this/I have room to grow/this is how I can better” and instead of “Other people are better than me” we might try thinking “Other people might be ahead now, and I can learn from them”.

So, to start writing this by saying “You won’t take any good photos today”, seems ostensibly negative and completely antithetical, but when we unpack it, it actually starts to take some of the pressure off of us as photographers. And it doesn’t have to be just applied to photography, you could switch this up to anything else that you do!

If we look at it again, saying that “You won’t take any good photos today” is very different to saying “You can’t take any good photos today”. We can all take good photos, we have the knowledge and the skills to do it. We just don’t always do it!

So when we say this, we’re not saying that we can’t do it, we’re saying that we won’t. This is isn’t about being negative, it’s about lowering our own expectations the amount of strong outcomes that we have when we’re getting the images out of the camera, and lets face it, we’ve all been disappointed at some point or other when we’ve been to a location we’ve been excited to get to and got home to find that the shot we wanted wasn’t quite right, the light didn’t help or whatever other reason it is that’s stopped us from being as successful as wanted. This is because, in our heads, we have built everything up so much, that we think we are coming home with a card full of bangers and then we don’t have a single one. It’s gruelling right? If this has never happened to you, please let me know what your secret is and well go into business together!

So what makes a good photo?

I refer you back to my to the opening of this blog: You won’t take any good photos today… If you know the definitive solution to this statement, let me know and we will go into business together and can retire at the start of next month.

This is one of the beautiful things about photography in that, it is so subjective that no one can give you the answer.

You could ask 100 photographers this question and I reckon that all of them would say something different, and they would all say “that’s a really tough question”.

Some people will mention sharpness, some will mention blur, some will mention expsosure and others will mention colour. Most of them will mention story in some form or other. A sharp photo isn’t always a good photo, a blurry photo isn’t always a bad photo, some photos will be way underexposed or over exposed and will still be good photos.

The answer to this isn’t a definitive one. That’s because (in my opinion) there are good photos and there are technically good photos.

By technically good, I mean that they are sharp where they need to be, they are well exposed and they have a balanced composition. Good photos don’t have to be technically good; if you think about intentional camera movement (ICM) then there isn’t much in this style of photography that is sharp: that’s the whole point of it!

If I’m taking pack shots, then there isn’t a story, they’re photos of objects which are intended to be honest. They need to be technically good so that they show the object/item off at it’s best and in a way which shows it for what it is; the client isn’t after creativity, they want the brief fulfilling and they want clear shots. These shots are technically good, but at the same time, they’re not going to win any awards. Such is the need for technical accuracy, that AI is starting to get involved with this in a big way.

So what makes a good image? For me, it’s one that makes you think, makes you stop and makes you ask questions. Not everyone will like all of your image, art is subjective and it’s divisive. One of the most expensive photos ever sold at auction (Andreas Gursky’s Rhein II) is one such photograph. It’s one of a series of photographs of the River Rhein, which flows through the centre of the frame with grass one either bank, an overcast sky and a path in the foreground. Everything runs horizontally. I think what I like about it is that you can view it top to bottom (like layers in cake), or from front to back link you are standing and looking at the scene. To some people, this will be a boring photo, but for me it’s not just a good photo, it’s a great photo… someone thought it was great to the tune of around $2.7million, but there are some people who won’t think it’s worth more than a tenner!

Your Camera

Better camera’s don’t take better photos. Read that again… Better camera’s don’t take better photos.

They might make higher resolution images in a way that makes the process easier, may be more intuitive and will make your life easier in post processing. If you’re a wildlife photographer, the better autofocus systems might give you more in focus shots. But they won’t help you to take ‘good’ images and they won’t make you a better photographer.

Think about some of the great photographers of the last 100 years. Ansell Adams, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Ernst Haas, Elliot Erwitt - the list could (and probably should) go on and one. But none of them used digital cameras. They didn’t have the autofocus systems that we have today, they probably didn’t have light meters in their cameras, they didn’t have the technology in their lenses that we have in the modern world but they still took great photographs.

When I got my first DSLR and took it out for the firs time, at night, in London I was set to come back with 100’s of photos that were going to blow people’s minds.

I did not.

I even thought that there was something wrong with the camera. There wasn’t, but there was a problem behind the camera, in someone who thought that the camera was going to do all of the heavy lifting. I had to spend time learning the theory and the technqiues and had to invest in a tripod. I even had to the read the camera manual… assisted by some demonstrations on YouTube.

But, telling myself that I might not take any good images made it even sweeter the first time came back and downloaded my card to find some images that I was pleased with and wanted to share with people.

Photography companies are great at making new cameras and they are just as good at marketing and making you think that you need the latest pieces of kit. You should only upgrade your kit when you’re need to, not just because the manufacturers told you that you should.

A few years ago, teaching photography I had a student with a Canon 5D Mark IV and a student with an entry level Canon, it was something like a 4000D. Guess who was taking the better photos… I’ll give you a clue; it wasn’t the person with the expensive camera.

Remember, the most important thing in photgraphy isn’t what taking the photos, it’s who’s taking the photos and the bit of electrified meat between their ears that is telling them how to take it.

So Why Aren’t You Going to Take Any Good Photos?

I mean, this a bit of a harsh question, you are going to take good photos, but if you can adjust your mindset and think that you’re not going to, you avoid the disappointment of having nothing you’re proud of, but you also have the joy of coming back to the edit and seeing that you have got more than you expected.

If you go out all the time thinking that you’re going to have endless good, usable photos on your memory card only to find that you don’t, you’re going to begin to fall out of love of with photography pretty quickly.

Even people who do landscape photography full time will go out and not come back with an image that they are happy with. They might have some technically excellent images, but nothing that they feel is ‘good’.

Remember

Photography is art, and as I have said, art is subjective.

Not everyone is going to like your photos, and that’s ok. Not all of your shots are going to be good, and that’s ok too. You won’t get banger after banger every time you go out to shoot, sometimes you will come back with a whole card of photos that you don’t like or you don’t think are any good, and guess what? That’s ok!

Thanks for reading, I hope you found this useful/insightful! If you’d like to be the first hear about new blogs and reviews and to keep up to date with what I am doing and see my latest work, please consider signing up to my newsletter.

If you’d like to support the blog and help me keep producing Lake District photography content, honest gear reviews and regular website updates, you can do so via my Buy Me a Coffee page. Keeping everything running smoothly takes time, and your support makes a real difference. Thank you.

Does Photography Gear Matter ?

Welcome to my first blog! It’s a cold, sunny, Sunday morning here in Cumbria so I’ve made a brew and sat down to try and answer the question “Does photography gear matter?”. This a question that will have ten’s of thousands of answers out there on the wider internet, and I’m going to share my thoughts here.

Where to start?

There are thousands of camera options available to you, just as many lens options, there’s all of the different filter and tripod options and don’t even get me started on bags (this is a separate blog all on its own!).

I get asked a lot “what’s the best camera?” or “what’s the best lens for portrait/landscape/street?”. The best answer I have heard to these questions and the one I like the best is “the one you already have”. Even if that’s the one that you have on your phone. Phone cameras are getting better by the day, and some of them even shoot raw images, which give you more flexibility when you’re editing.

But what if you don’t already own any camera gear and want to move away from your phone, where should you start, what should you get and where should you buy it from?

In truth, if you have a budget of, for example, £1000 (about $1200US), then you should (in my opinion) look to spend about half of this on your camera and lens combination. Why? Because if it breaks or you break it, it gets full of water or some other unthinkable thing happens to it then you have enough in the bank to be able to replace it. So the best camera is the one that you have and the one that you can afford to replace. I’ll talk about your first lens later.

Buying you first camera and lens is only the beginning. Once you have made this purchase, you’ll need to think about what sort of photography you’re going to do and the conditions that you’re going to be shooting in. If it’s anything that’s likely to be in low light situations, then you’ll need a tripod if you’re going to get sharp images, free of camera movement, which you can be proud of.

Then you’re going to need to be able to move it all so a decent, comfortable camera bag will be essential. So out of our remaining £500, we’ve probably just spent another £50-75!

But what about your lens? This is an important decision. The quality of your glass is important and is probably one of the things that will have the biggest impact of the quality and feel of your images (vintage lenses create some great looks, when you’re ready to dive down that rabbit hole). Most consumer DSLR/mirroless cameras can be supplied with a “kit” lens. These are usually cheaper than premium lenses, but won’t be weatherproof, so be careful if you’re using it in the rain. Kit lenses are generally zoom lenses, which is great when you are just starting out as it means you’ve got a range of focal lengths covered so you can experiment, be flexible and have fun with your images. The Canon 18-55mm f/4.5-5.6 is a common kit lens that you can buy with their cameras. Just be sure the check that the lens is included in the price that you pay, as a general rule, DSLR/Mirrorless cameras don’t come supplied with a lens and you’ll have to buy this separately.

New or Secondhand?

This is a question that is likely to be dictated by your budget, but you also get a lot more bang for your buck if you are willing to make a second hand purchase. The secondhand camera market is huge and there are some bargains to be had if you know where to look. The best places to start this search are websites like MPB and Wex.

Both of these sellers are reputable UK brands who supply the kit with a warranty and everything is thoroughly checked before it goes on their websites, so you can be sure you’re not throwing money away and buying a dud.

3 of the lenses in my current set-up were bought secondhand and haven’t caused me a single problem and have proven to be great value for money.

You can also consider places such as Facebook marketplace and eBay, but make sure that you do your research and don’t get either ripped off or scammed!

There is also a large “grey market” for cameras. I won’t post any links here, but I am sure you will be able to do a quick Google search and make up your own mind. With regard to the grey market for cameras, you’ll get an authorised product but outside of the manufacturers authorised distribution channels. So you might buy a lens from a UK based seller, but the product wasn’t intended for the UK or European markets, meaning you don’t get any of the manufacturers warranty protection if something goes wrong.

Will people take me seriously?

Don’t worry about what other people think. Use what works for you; the most important thing is that you ‘get on’ with your setup. That being said, if you get booked to photograph a wedding and turn up with an iPhone and nothing else, you’re going to get some funny looks!

“Is this a professional camera?”, another question that gets asked repeatedly and one that doesn’t have a really well defined answer. Any camera can be a professional camera if you’re using it to make money. What portion of your income you need to be making to be considered professional is another discussion for another time! Also worth noting at this juncture, if you’re out shooting and you end up on private land (such as Canary Wharf in London or the area around Tower Bridge), you’ll probably told by a security guard that any camera that has an interchangeable lens is a professional camera so that they can make you stop and move you on (always be polite and do what they ask, it makes it easier for everyone else who has to encounter them in the future); luckily, you’ll probably have another camera in your pocket anyway.

So, does gear matter?

Yes.

And no.

And also maybe. To some extent.

If you’re reading this and you have made it this far, chances are you’ve read a few articles on this topic and heard a number of different opinions.

If you have a camera on your phone and you’re happy with it then great! If you want some more flexibility in what you do then you may want to consider your first DLSR/mirrorless purchase.

Gear matters if you let it matter. Going out and buying a Canon R5 with an L series lens is going to set you back in excess of £6500 and isn’t going to make you a better photographer, no matter what your experience level. It will create lovely files with lots of data that will be great to edit, but they won’t necessarily be “good photos”. If you’re spending this kind of money on your first camera because “it will encourage me to go out and shoot” then the chances are that in 6 months time you’re going to have a very expensive ornament sat on your shelf! Remember the old adage that photography happens in the space between the photographer’s ears.

The resolution/megapixel count on newer cameras is huge, which is great if you’re drastically cropping images and want to retain the image quality. But bear in mind, that if you’re after the resolution, then consider the Canon 5DS or 5DSR. Both of these have more megapixels (50.3MP) than the R5 and are now about 8 years old so can be found for about £5000 less than the newer cameras.

What matters most is that you’ve got a setup that works for you and that you can use easily, confidently and that allows you to be out there making photos. You can’t make images if you don’t get out to take them!